Saturday, July 27, 2013

Town Mouse and Country Mouse

The disparity between urban and rural has been around since the beginning of civilization. Greek slave Aesop wrote about the Town Mouse and the Country Mouse between 620 and 560 BCE, suggesting that the distinction was already familiar even then. The world of the city is a very different place than living in the country, and people generally have a preference for one or the other. Rural people are more independent and self-reliant, accustomed to taking care of themselves and having a small number of neighbors. Urbanites enjoy the benefits of public services like police protection, fire fighters, paved roads, clean water, education, and hospitals; as well as convenient access to a large variety of goods and entertainment. More importantly, the higher pay of manufacturing jobs has traditionally made urban living more opulent than subsistence farming could provide. In spite of having a large number of neighbors, however, urbanites are typically less likely to have as many friends as their country cousins, though the constant association with a diverse population does make them more open to people unlike themselves.
The gap between urban and rural lifestyles has been getting wider throughout the industrial age, and shows signs of becoming much, much worse in the information age. Living in the country now means less access to internet and cell phone services, though satellites are bridging that gap – if you have the money. Increasingly, people who have the money to stay connected are moving to country estates for the privacy that country living affords them. Away from the cameras and surveillance that have become the new normal for city dwellers. The suburbs are no longer enough to get away from the problems of urban living, and even small towns are becoming increasingly urbanized.
In America, as with every industrialized nation in the twenty-first century, to live in the city means to surrender your anonymity. You are public. What secrets you have are becoming harder and harder to protect. There are advantages to the encroaching surveillance and intrusion – crime rates are down in places that have security cameras installed. We trade our freedom for security, which is becoming an easier pill to swallow as our lives become increasingly padded with technology. A cell phone with built-in video camera is a powerful weapon on the city streets, protection from police corruption and insurance investigators as well as the odd mugger or rapist. Better, in many respects, than a gun, which has its own hazards in this environment. Many city dwellers own firearms in the USA, but the situations where a gun is an advantage is unbalanced by even more situations where just having a gun will get you in trouble. Extreme care must be used when drawing a gun in a city, and poor judgment can cost innocent lives.
Living independently in deep rural environments means doing without most of the technological comforts or lack of privacy. You are responsible for your own security, which probably consists of a combination of dogs and guns and fences. Your security makes you more isolated from your neighbors, but the people you do meet are very likely to have similar ideas about such things – as well as similar tastes in music, religion, and politics. Education is harder to get, but also carries less of an advantage. Life is simpler – much simpler. It is easy to reduce complex issues to their most basic terms – everything is black-and-white. Freedom is paramount, because that’s really the only advantage you have over the city dweller.
This is the dividing factor in American politics right now – town mouse versus country mouse. Urban liberals against rural conservatives. In the long run, the numbers of the rural population will dwindle until they no longer represent a political force to be reckoned with, while the increased educational benefits of urban living will create a more diverse variety of liberals. In the meantime, the dying conservative movement is thrashing in impotent rage – their simplistic ideology still a powerful tool of the sociopathic industrialists. Things will get worse before they get better, but they will get better.
There is a new breed of rural dweller. More connected, less isolated, better educated. More open minded than the stodgy conservatives of a simpler time. Still fond of freedom, dogs, and guns – but also more open to new ideas. These people put up solar panels and/or windmills to improve their self-sufficiency. They recycle, and practice sustainable farming practices. They surf the ‘net and watch TV on a satellite service. Most importantly, less likely to be a tool for Big Business and evangelical grifters. This is the new country mouse. Not so different than the town mouse anymore, but still not exactly the same. City and country will always be different worlds, but as we continue to evolve into the twenty-second century, we will find that our differences are less important than our commonalities.
We are all human, and that is what binds us. No environment can change us so much that we lose that bond. We are too much alike to let small differences divide us, and the sooner we all learn that, the better our lives will be.




Labels: , , , ,

Friday, February 20, 2009

Alone?

Sometimes I think it is necessary to remember what we are and how we got here. It is so easy to get caught up in the details of living that we need to occasionally take a moment to step back and look at the larger picture, and put it into the greater context of humanity as a whole.

We are, by nature or design, social animals. What does that mean, exactly? Ants and wolves are also social animals; that is, their principle means of survival is to cooperate as a group. Our skill with language gives us a capacity to cooperate that is unprecedented in the animal kingdom, and when combined with the tool-using abilities of our hands and the unlimited imaginative capacities of our brains, our dominance of this planet was inevitable.

We lack the strength and natural weapons of a tiger or bear, but any individual human can easily defeat either of these predators using brains and hands, combined with the tools that these advantages can provide – such as a stone-tipped spear or a high-powered rifle. As individuals we are mighty, and it is easy to seek the path of the lone hunter. Indeed, the romance of wilderness survival alone is a strong motivator for many of us to think that we don’t really need other humans at all.

As individuals, we can survive. Not always well, and certainly not as well as we can when cooperating with others as a group. Alone, with only the tools and supplies we can make with our own hands, we cannot make a jet airliner, or a modern hospital, or even an Egyptian pyramid. These things require a group effort.

It is still possible to find people living a stone-age lifestyle in the more isolated places on our world. Deep in the jungles of the Amazon, the Congo or Borneo, there are villages that still practice the old ways. Naked children run free and laugh and play. Elders sit by the fire to discuss issues of the day or tell stories of days past. The crippled and infirm are cared for, because they too contribute to the survival of the group in their own way. The wisdom of this is obvious to everyone in the village.

Caring for the sick and injured is part of our survival strategy. It is one of the things that make us human.

I live in the United States of America, which is one of the richest and most technologically advanced nations on Earth. Ironically, it is not a good place to be poor. Of all the Western nations, it has the least accessibility to medical care for those unable to pay for it. As a result, one of the leading causes of death in the USA is, directly or indirectly, poverty.

Why? I think it has something to do with that romanticizing of the lone hunter that I mentioned earlier. Or, the updated and uniquely American version of it, the lone cowboy. In our national pride of our freedoms, and our emphasis on individual achievement over group effort, we sometimes forget that we can only do such great things as a society through cooperation with others. And part of the social cooperation strategy involves a group effort to care for the sick and injured.

We need to get past the idea that a universal health plan is leading us down the slippery slope to communism. It is not. We can retain our hard-won freedoms and still ensure that every child has a chance to grow up, every elder can pass on their knowledge to future generations, and the sick and injured can recover to rejoin society. Even the permanently maimed and crippled can contribute to our group survival, and are worthy of care.

We must remember that caring about others is not a weakness, but our greatest strength.

Labels: ,

Sunday, April 06, 2008

Bio-Fuel FTL

The two biggest problems currently facing humanity are Peak Oil and the Climate Crisis.

These problems would appear to have a similar solution: stop burning fuel.

It doesn't get much simpler than that, right?

There are ways to do that, like investing in solar and wind power, and drive electric cars.

Some people think that bio-diesel and ethanol, used as fuels to replace petroleum-based fuels, are viable solutions as well. Not so.

Millions of acres of rain forest are being cut down to make room for palm-oil and soy bean plantations - to make bio-diesel and ethanol for fuel. But, since we need the rain forests for their photosynthesis (CO2 -> O2), destroying them just makes things worse.

And, in the end, you are still burning fuel that produces carbon dioxide.

Hydrogen Fuel Cells are another power source being proposed. This is great, as long as you don't make the hydrogen out of petro-chemicals, which makes more carbon dioxide during processing. In any case, hydrogen is considered an energy carrier, rather than an energy source, because it requires energy from other sources to produce it. You might as well be running on batteries.

Which brings us to electric cars. Check out these manufacturers:

http://www.teslamotors.com/
http://www.zapworld.com/

and, of course:

http://www.chevrolet.com/electriccar/

Order yours today.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

NEXT

Saw this book in the store last week, bought it on impulse (I've enjoyed most of Dr. Crichton's work so far), and spent the next 3 consecutive nights reading it. Since then, I've been swishing the concepts back and forth in my mind.

I'm not sure I agree with all of the conclusions he comes to, and the style of writing was a bit confusing to me at first, but overall I think the story was good. It certainly sparked thought.

My first conclusion: I fully support his argument to ban all gene patents. This is a trend which can only lead to disaster.

Second: I do not want a puppy that never grows up.

Third: I would like to learn more about African Grey Parrots. I don't think I would like to own one, since they require as much care as a human child, if not more. But, the idea of a bird with intelligence as great as a chimpanzee is intriguing.

Again, a good read. I recommend it.

Labels: ,

Friday, March 03, 2006

Poverty and Depression

According to Prof. Elizabeth Gould, of Princeton University: "We have found that stressful experiences inhibit the production of new neurons in the hippocampus of adult rodents and primates. Moreover, developmental stress (either prenatal or early postnatal) persistently diminishes the production of new neurons, even into adulthood."

The social implications of this research, according to an article by Johah Lehrer in the Feb/March issue of Seed Magazine, are that: "If boring environments, stressful noises, and the primate's particular slot in the dominance hierarchy all shape the architecture of the brain - and Gould's team has shown that they do - then the playing field isn't level. Poverty and stress aren't just an idea: they are an anatomy. Some brains never even have a chance."

Poor people are not poor because they are lazy. The growth of their brain cells has been limited by their environment.

If you take a man or woman who was raised in an environment of wealth, and take away that wealth, they are very likely to rebuild their fortune and return to their previous status within a year. Part of the reason why, is that they know how to handle money and they understand what is needed to be successful. But a larger part is that they have a brain capable of working on the problem.

If you take a person born into poverty and give them several million dollars (let's say they win the lottery), what will they do with it? It is a very rare individual who will invest their winnings and build it into a sustainable base. Most of the time, they just blow it and end up right back where they started. In some cases, they end up worse off than before.

That may be old news, but this part is not: the condition may be treatable.

Page 65 of the Feb/March issue of Seed Magazine, in the above-named article: "The theory that depression is caused by a lack of serotonin is mostly wrong; Yale's Ronald Duman is showing that Prozac triggers neurogenesis."

Poverty kills. The Canadians, at least, seem to understand this. The United States seems to find it baffling.

I'm not suggesting giving free Prozac to the poor (though Eli Lilly and company could sure use the positive publicity), but, once we know we can do something to repair a problem in our society, shouldn't we be working on it?

Labels: , ,

Friday, September 09, 2005

On the other hand...

I did not mean to imply that New Orleans should not be rebuilt. Sorry if that's what came across.

New Orleans should be rebuilt BETTER than it was.

Start by bulldozing the buildings ruined by water, wind, fire, and toxic mold. Then, make those places that were below sea-level into sanitary landfills - to raise them up to a safe level to avoid such further flooding. THEN rebuild on the site.

No more shanty-towns, people. No more substandard housing for the poor. Build low-income housing that is up to code and fit for people to live in.

oh, and strong enough to survive a hurricane, if you please.

Labels: , ,

Monday, September 05, 2005

Between blows...

Katrina was the worst hurricane to hit NOLA in a very long time. So far.

I've been saying for years that the overall effect of global warning will be to make our weather more energetic - particularly hurricanes, which are essentially heat-driven.

The hurricane season is not over for this year. And what about the next?

New Orleans was a very pretty little city. It will take a lot of money to rebuild it. Even more the next time. And the next.

At what point do you give up and move the tourist traps to Baton Rouge (which is French for red stick)?

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, January 26, 2005

Diamonds are NOT forever!

Diamonds are very hard, but they are not immune to harm.

Diamonds are carbon. They burn at 1560 degrees F. The solder holding it on the ring melts at a higher temperature than that, which is why jewelers coat a diamond with boric acid to protect it when they mount it on a piece of jewelry. The boric acid seals the diamond from the air, so it can get hot without burning. Then, after the diamond has cooled so it doesn't shatter when they put water on it, they just wash the boric acid off.

Next time someone tells you that "Diamonds Are Forever", tell him

NOTHING

LASTS

FOREVER!

Labels: